Chapter 6 • 3 Hours • Expected Marks: 3M Tested in Q8 or Q10 (Short Notes / Air Gap Numerical)

Magnetic Circuit and Induction

Magnetomotive force, reluctance, air-gap fringing, B-H loops, Steinmetz core losses, and electromagnetic induction fundamentals.

6.1 & 6.2 Magnetic Circuits vs. Electric Circuits

Concept & Fundamental Laws

A magnetic circuit is the closed path traversed by magnetic lines of force (flux). Magnetomotive force (MMF) drives magnetic flux through the reluctance of magnetic materials, strictly analogous to how EMF drives electric current through resistance: \[\mathcal{F} = N I = \Phi \mathcal{R}\] Where:
• \(\mathcal{F}\) = Magnetomotive Force (MMF) [Ampere-Turns, AT]
• \(\Phi\) = Magnetic flux [Webers, Wb]
• \(\mathcal{R}\) = Reluctance [AT/Wb] = \(\frac{l}{\mu A} = \frac{l}{\mu_0 \mu_r A}\)
• \(\mathcal{P}\) = Permeance [Wb/AT] = \(1/\mathcal{R}\)

Comparison Table: Magnetic vs. Electric Circuits

Feature Electric Circuit Magnetic Circuit
Driving Potential Electromotive Force (\(\text{EMF} = V\)) [Volts] Magnetomotive Force (\(\text{MMF} = N I\)) [Ampere-turns]
Resulting Flow / Field Electric Current (\(I\)) [Amperes] Magnetic Flux (\(\Phi\)) [Webers]
Opposition Resistance \(R = \rho \frac{l}{A} = \frac{l}{\sigma A}\) [\(\Omega\)] Reluctance \(\mathcal{R} = \frac{l}{\mu_0 \mu_r A}\) [AT/Wb]
Conductivity / Permeability Conductivity \(\sigma\) (constant with current) Permeability \(\mu = \mu_0 \mu_r\) (varies with \(B\))
Current / Flux Density Current Density \(J = I/A\) [A/m\(^2\)] Flux Density \(B = \Phi/A\) [Tesla]
Potential Gradient Electric Field \(E = V/l\) [V/m] Magnetic Field Intensity \(H = \mathcal{F}/l\) [AT/m]
Energy Consumption Energy is continuously dissipated as heat (\(I^2 R\)). Energy is required only to establish the field; no continuous power is consumed to maintain static flux!

Air Gap, Leakage Flux & Fringing


• Leakage Flux: Magnetic flux that strays outside the intended iron path and closes through ambient air.
• Fringing Effect: At an air gap, magnetic flux lines repel each other and bulge outward into surrounding space. This increases the effective cross-sectional area of the air gap (\(A_g > A_{\text{core}}\)), which slightly reduces the actual flux density in the gap.

6.3 & 6.4 B-H Curve, Hysteresis & Eddy Current Losses

The Hysteresis Phenomenon

When a ferromagnetic core is magnetized by an alternating current, the flux density \(B\) lags behind the magnetizing force \(H\). This lag is known as magnetic hysteresis.
• Retentivity (Residual Magnetism): The flux density \(B_r\) remaining in the core when the magnetizing field \(H\) is reduced to zero.
• Coercivity (Coercive Force): The reverse magnetic field intensity \(H_c\) required to completely demagnetize the core (\(B = 0\)).

Core Loss Formulations

\[\text{Hysteresis Loss: } P_h = \eta \, B_{\text{max}}^{1.6} \, f \, V \text{ [Watts]}\] \[\text{Eddy Current Loss: } P_e = K_e \, B_{\text{max}}^2 \, f^2 \, t^2 \, V \text{ [Watts]}\]
Loss Reduction Methods:
• Hysteresis Loss: Minimized by using high-grade silicon steel (e.g. CRGO steel) with a narrow B-H hysteresis loop.
• Eddy Current Loss: Because \(P_e \propto t^2\), laminating the iron core into thin sheets (\(0.35 - 0.5\text{ mm}\)) insulated by varnish drastically increases electrical resistance across eddy current loops!

6.5 & 6.6 Electromagnetic Induction & Conductor Force

Category Statically Induced EMF Dynamically Induced EMF
Mechanism Conductor remains stationary; magnetic flux links it and varies with time. Magnetic field is stationary; conductor physically moves across flux lines.
Governing Law Faraday's Law: \(e = -N \frac{d\Phi}{dt} = -L \frac{di}{dt}\) Lorentz Induction: \(e = B l v \sin\theta\)
Direction Rule Lenz's Law (opposes rate of change of flux) Fleming's Right-Hand Rule (Thumb = Motion, Forefinger = Field, Middle = Induced Current)
Application Transformers, inductors, chokes. DC Generators, AC Alternators.

Master Worked Example: MMF with Air Gap (PYQ 2082 Bhadra Q8)

Composite Magnetic Circuit MMF Calculation PYQ 2082 Bhadra Q8 (5 Marks)
Given:
Mean ring length \(l_m = 0.5\text{ m}\)
Cross-sectional area \(A = 100\text{ cm}^2 = 0.01\text{ m}^2\)
Air gap length \(l_g = 4\text{ mm} = 0.004\text{ m}\)
Required air gap flux \(\Phi = 2\text{ mWb} = 0.002\text{ Wb}\)
Coil turns \(N = 200\), Relative permeability \(\mu_r = 800\).
Calculations:
Flux density: \[B = \frac{\Phi}{A} = \frac{0.002}{0.01} = 0.2\text{ Tesla}\] Iron path length: \[l_i = l_m - l_g = 0.5 - 0.004 = 0.496\text{ m}\] MMF for Iron Ring: \[\text{MMF}_i = H_i \times l_i = \left(\frac{B}{\mu_0 \mu_r}\right) l_i = \frac{0.2}{4\pi \times 10^{-7} \times 800} \times 0.496 \approx 198.94 \times 0.496 \approx 98.68\text{ AT}\] MMF for Air Gap: \[\text{MMF}_g = H_g \times l_g = \left(\frac{B}{\mu_0}\right) l_g = \frac{0.2}{4\pi \times 10^{-7}} \times 0.004 \approx 159,155 \times 0.004 \approx 636.62\text{ AT}\] Total MMF Required: \[\text{Total MMF} = \text{MMF}_i + \text{MMF}_g = 98.68 + 636.62 = 735.30\text{ AT}\]
Final Answer: Total MMF required = \(735.3\text{ AT}\). Notice that although the air gap is only 0.8% of the total ring length, it demands 86.6% of the total MMF due to low permeability!